W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > October 2013

[RESOLVED] Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" - ISSUE-147

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:57:33 -0400
Message-ID: <52680E0D.4040903@dbooth.org>
To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
CC: RDF Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
This change is acceptable to me.

thanks,
David

On 10/16/2013 09:11 AM, David Wood wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> This is an official response from the RDF Working Group regarding
> your comment at [1] on the definition of "Generalized RDF".  Your
> comment is being tracked at our ISSUE-147 [2].
>
> The WG discussed your concerns at our 2 Oct telecon [3] and via email
> [4].  Those discussions resulted in a decision to leave the
> definition of "generalized RDF" in RDF 1.1 Concepts, but to change
> the definition to the following: [[ Generalized RDF triples, graphs,
> and datasets differ from normative RDF triples, graphs, and datasets
> only by allowing IRIs, blank nodes and literals to appear anywhere as
> subject, predicate, object or graph name. ]]
>
> My action to make the editorial changes was tracked at [5].
>
> The updated section 7 is available in the current editors' draft
> [6].
>
> Please advise the working group whether this change is acceptable to
> you by responding to this message.  Thank you for your
> participation.
>
> Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood
>
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Oct/0006.html
>
>
[2] ISSUE-147: https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/147
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-10-09#line0228 [4]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Oct/0030.html
> [5] ACTION-309: https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/309 [6]
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-generalized-rdf
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 17:58:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 23 October 2013 17:58:01 UTC