W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > October 2013

Re: procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics (ISSUE-146)

From: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:36:02 -0700
Cc: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "David Booth" <david@dbooth.org>
Message-Id: <6B46CF78-017C-4296-AA58-792C409E2728@syapse.com>
To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2013Oct/0022.html

addresses my comment to my full satisfaction. Thank you

Jeremy J Carroll
Principal Architect
Syapse, Inc.



On Oct 2, 2013, at 4:25 AM, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> wrote:

> Dear Jeremy,
> 
> Thanks for your comment. We have raised an issue for tracking your comment [1]. We will get back to you on this.
> 
> Best,
> Guus, on behalf of the RDF WG
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/146
> 
> On 02-10-13 04:06, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> David's earlier message seems to highlight a procedural irregularity.
>> 
>> I think it is a reasonable expectation that the RDF WG invite Semantic
>> Web interest group participants to review the last call documents, and
>> this does not appear to have been done in this case.
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
>> "The Working Group must announce the Last Call to other W3C groups"
>> 
>> and
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter
>> [[
>> Semantic Web Coordination Group <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/CG/>
>>    To ensure synchronization with all other Working and Interest Groups
>>    in the Semantic Web Activity.
>>    ]]
>> 
>> 
>> Synchronization seems to have been lacking in this case.
>> 
>> 
>> Jeremy J Carroll
>> Principal Architect
>> Syapse, Inc.
>> 
>> 
>> 
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 19:36:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 3 October 2013 19:36:31 UTC