W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > October 2013

Re: procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics (ISSUE-146)

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:25:06 +0200
Message-ID: <524C0292.8020106@vu.nl>
To: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>
CC: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "David Booth" <david@dbooth.org>
Dear Jeremy,

Thanks for your comment. We have raised an issue for tracking your 
comment [1]. We will get back to you on this.

Best,
Guus, on behalf of the RDF WG

[1] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/146

On 02-10-13 04:06, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
>
>
> David's earlier message seems to highlight a procedural irregularity.
>
> I think it is a reasonable expectation that the RDF WG invite Semantic
> Web interest group participants to review the last call documents, and
> this does not appear to have been done in this case.
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
> "The Working Group must announce the Last Call to other W3C groups"
>
> and
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/01/rdf-wg-charter
> [[
> Semantic Web Coordination Group <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/CG/>
>     To ensure synchronization with all other Working and Interest Groups
>     in the Semantic Web Activity.
>     ]]
>
>
> Synchronization seems to have been lacking in this case.
>
>
> Jeremy J Carroll
> Principal Architect
> Syapse, Inc.
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 11:25:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:58 UTC