W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-132: JSON-LD/RDF Alignment

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 16:27:29 -0400
Message-ID: <51B393B1.5050704@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 6/8/13 2:27 PM, David Booth wrote:
> Yes. We are arguing about the attempt to re-defined the notion of 
> Linked Data to not be based on RDF. 
You can seriously make that inaccurate claim after reading the original 
meme 
<http://web.archive.org/web/20061201121454/http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html> 
?

Linked Data took off without an RDF specificity.

Linked Data is something you can produce, in highly useful form, via 
RDF. That doesn't make it a subset of RDF. Sorry, but that's utter nonsense!

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Saturday, 8 June 2013 20:27:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:57 UTC