W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2013

RE: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-132: JSON-LD/RDF Alignment

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 21:10:08 +0200
To: "'public-rdf-comments'" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003201ce647b$cb436630$61ca3290$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Saturday, June 08, 2013 8:46 PM, David Booth wrote:
> On 06/08/2013 02:30 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> > You didn't read the intro, but already there we say
> >
> >     Developers that require any of the facilities listed above or
> >     need to serialize an RDF graph or dataset [RDF11-CONCEPTS] in
> >     a JSON-based syntax will find JSON-LD of interest.
> >
> > IMHO that's crystal clear.
> 
> But clarity needs to be assessed in the eyes of the *readers* -- not
> the authors.  Obviously it is *not* clear to readers, as you've heard
> substantially similar comments on this point from both Sven and from
> me.

But being a *reader* implies reading the text. Sven didn't do that. But you are right. It's him who has to assess whether that statement is clear after reading it.



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Saturday, 8 June 2013 19:10:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:57 UTC