W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > May 2012

RE: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 00:01:44 +0800
To: <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <017d01cd3834$31d7bf10$95873d30$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
Hi

Thanks Ivan for answering this. The formal specification of the to/from RDF
conversion is in the API spec: http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-api/
which still needs a bit of work.

Btw. I can't join the RDF WG mailing list. Is there anything I must know?


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 9:19 PM
> To: Richard Cyganiak
> Cc: Manu Sporny; RDF WG; Linked JSON
> Subject: Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
> 
> I am not Manu, but what I know is...
> On May 22, 2012, at 14:17 , Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> 
> > Hi Manu,
> >
> > A couple of questions:
> >
> > * Is JSON-LD an RDF serialization?
> 
> I think the best way of saying it is: it can be used as an RDF
> serialization, although applications may use it directly, too, without
> referring to RDF.
> 
> > * Given a JSON-LD document, how do I get an RDF graph from it?
> 
> The answer is that this is a bit hidden in the document though, when
> reading it, the conversion is fairly clear. But I agree is it not
> explicit. Manu, it may be worth having a separate section that makes
> that mapping absolutely explicit and formal.
> 
> > * Given an RDF graph, how do I turn it into a JSON-LD document?
> 
> I think that if we get the previous issue done, that answers this
> question, too.
> 
> > * Can any RDF graph be serialized as a JSON-LD document?
> >
> 
> Yes.
> 
> B.t.w., just for the fun of it: the RDFa 1.1 distiller
> http://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/ already has a JSON-LD serialization
> option (alongside RDF/XML and turtle).
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> > Best,
> > Richard
> >
> >
> > On 22 May 2012, at 05:19, Manu Sporny wrote:
> >
> >> Last week, the Linked Data in JSON Community Group discussed whether
> or
> >> not we thought that JSON-LD was ready to be moved into the RDF WG
> for
> >> REC-track standardization:
> >>
> >> http://json-ld.org/minutes/2012-05-15/#topic-1
> >>
> >> There was consensus that the JSON-LD Syntax is finalized (as far as
> the
> >> CG is concerned). There may be one more change that we are
> considering,
> >> but that change would depend on feedback we get from this group.
> There
> >> will, of course, be plenty of opportunity to discuss changes to the
> spec
> >> in the RDF WG.
> >>
> >> There is a date-stamped document that is available for review here:
> >>
> >> http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120522/
> >>
> >> So, this is a request to place the JSON-LD Syntax specification on
> the
> >> W3C Recommendation track via the RDF Working Group. David, Guus -
> what
> >> are the next steps?
> >>
> >> -- manu
> >>
> >> --
> >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> >> blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched
> >> http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 16:02:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 16:02:44 GMT