W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Comment on RDF 1.1: use case for HTML5 data type

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 19:45:04 +0200
Message-Id: <AE60A273-691D-44A7-882F-93686C79F852@w3.org>
Cc: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
To: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@inria.fr>
This would be mixing two different serializations of RDF. A similar question to yours would be if one adds an XML literal into Turtle, the XML Literal being RDF/XML. Would the RDF/XML encoded triples be automatically part of the graph defined by the Turtle level? Personally, I believe mixing serializations would not be a good idea in general, ie, the answer would be no. RDFa and RDF/XML are not different in this sense.


Ivan Herman
Tel:+31 641044153

(Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)

On 8 Jun 2012, at 17:50, Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@inria.fr> wrote:

> Hello everyone, 
> As the rdf:HTML Datatype has been accepted, one could add RDFa annotations in a rdf:HTML literal value.
> For instance, let ex:g be a RDF Graph that contains triple 
>  ex:x ex:p "<p vocab="http://schema.org/">My name is <span property="name">Manu Sporny</span></p>"^^rdf:HTML .
> What exactly would be the status of the inner triple? In particular, what RDF Graph would it belong to if any?
> Kind regards, 
> Maxime Lefrançois 
> Ph.D. Student, INRIA - WIMMICS Team 
> http://maxime-lefrancois.info 
> @Max_Lefrancois 
Received on Saturday, 9 June 2012 17:46:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:53 UTC