- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:56:22 +0000
- To: W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
I just reviewed the responses to Last Call comments. It appears that Souri's comment here hasn't been properly handled: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0000.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Nov/0002.html Or am I looking at the wrong document? I'm looking at this: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/LC/Overview.html We discussed this on a call here: http://www.w3.org/2011/11/08-RDB2RDF-minutes.html but the minutes don't capture a clear resolution to the issue. At any rate it's still broken and needs to be fixed. The simplest fix might be to replace the definition of “percent-encode” in the DM spec with a reference to “IRI-safe” in R2RML: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-iri-safe Best, Richard
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 15:57:00 UTC