W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Fixes required in Test Cases and Implementation Report docs

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 00:34:19 -0400
To: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20120802043418.GE3000@w3.org>
* Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> [2012-08-01 17:41-0700]
> Ok.  Great!  So, we are now waiting for Eric to fix the reference to the Implementation Report
> in the DM SOTD.

done.


> Thank you Richard and Boris for your late night work!
> All the best, Ashok
> 
> On 8/1/2012 5:32 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> >On 2 Aug 2012, at 00:54, Ashok Malhotra wrote:
> >>Richard, Eric:
> >>Can you update the SOTD in your documents with the URL for the implementation report?
> >Done for R2RML.
> >
> >Would have quickly done it for the DM too, but Eric's latest version is not in CVS, so I can't help here.
> >
> >>And the R2RML needs to update a reference to the Implementation report.
> >Right, forgot that one. Now fixed.
> >
> >The URL is still
> >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/PR-r2rml-20120814/
> >
> >And I believe it's good to go.
> >
> >Once the implementation report URL in the DM is fixed, and someone (Ivan?) confirms that the SotD on the two NOTEs [1][2] is fine, then we should be all done AFAICT.
> >
> >All the best,
> >Richard
> >
> >
> >[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/
> >[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/
> >
> >
> >
> >>I think that is all we need.
> >>All the best, Ashok
> >>
> >>On 8/1/2012 4:46 PM, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote:
> >>>Hi Richard
> >>>
> >>>Thank you very much for taking care of this.
> >>>
> >>>I updated both documents with your comments.
> >>>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/
> >>>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/
> >>>
> >>>Please let me know if there are more issues to solve.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks again
> >>>
> >>>Boris
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Aug 1, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Boris, Michael,
> >>>>
> >>>>My understanding is that TC and ImplRep will be published as W3C Notes. This means they get both timestamped URLs and permalinks in the http://www.w3.org/TR/ space.
> >>>>
> >>>>I understand that these are the latest candidate documents:
> >>>>
> >>>>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/
> >>>>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/
> >>>>
> >>>>I reviewed both from a W3C style point of view and they still need quite a few changes! A list is below.
> >>>>
> >>>>(I can help make those changes tomorrow morning if necessary.)
> >>>>
> >>>>Best,
> >>>>Richard
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>1. Date of publication needs to be changed to 14 August 2012
> >>>>
> >>>>2. “This version” needs to point to correct timestamped URL *in TR space*
> >>>>
> >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-test-cases/
> >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-implementations/
> >>>>
> >>>>3. “Latest version” needs to point to untimestamped shortname *in TR space*
> >>>>
> >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-test-cases-20120814/
> >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-implementations-20120814/
> >>>>
> >>>>4. SotD needs to be for a NOTE, not for an ED. I'm not sure what exactly the SotD should say, but I guess you can use these as rough templates:
> >>>>
> >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-api/
> >>>>• http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/
> >>>>
> >>>>5. References in the ImplRep need to use URLs in TR space with correct date, timestamp, and without “work in progress” markers.
> >>>>
> >>>>6. Many URLs in the body of both documents need to be updated from ED or from old WD/CR to latest PR URLs (or alrernatively to untimestamped shortname URL in TR space).               This includes all the spec references in the TC, and all the TC links in the ImplRep.
> >>>>
> >>>>7. TC Section 4 contains a messed-up link to "Section 10 of the R2RML specification"; I guess the intended target URL is http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/#note-natural-mapping-extensions
> >>>>
> >>>>8. ImplRep Section 4 (References) contains a messed-up reference for [RDB2RDF TC], there is some stuff about RDFa in there!?
> >>>>
> >>>>9. ImplRep calls it once [Direct Mapping] and then [DM]
> >>>>
> >>>>10. ImplRep defines a ref for [RDB2RDF-WG] that is never used, delete!
> >

-- 
-ericP
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 04:34:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:29 UTC