Re: Fixes required in Test Cases and Implementation Report docs

Ok.  Great!  So, we are now waiting for Eric to fix the reference to the Implementation Report
in the DM SOTD.

Thank you Richard and Boris for your late night work!
All the best, Ashok

On 8/1/2012 5:32 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 2 Aug 2012, at 00:54, Ashok Malhotra wrote:
>> Richard, Eric:
>> Can you update the SOTD in your documents with the URL for the implementation report?
> Done for R2RML.
>
> Would have quickly done it for the DM too, but Eric's latest version is not in CVS, so I can't help here.
>
>> And the R2RML needs to update a reference to the Implementation report.
> Right, forgot that one. Now fixed.
>
> The URL is still
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/PR-r2rml-20120814/
>
> And I believe it's good to go.
>
> Once the implementation report URL in the DM is fixed, and someone (Ivan?) confirms that the SotD on the two NOTEs [1][2] is fine, then we should be all done AFAICT.
>
> All the best,
> Richard
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/
>
>
>
>> I think that is all we need.
>> All the best, Ashok
>>
>> On 8/1/2012 4:46 PM, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote:
>>> Hi Richard
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for taking care of this.
>>>
>>> I updated both documents with your comments.
>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/
>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/
>>>
>>> Please let me know if there are more issues to solve.
>>>
>>> Thanks again
>>>
>>> Boris
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 1, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>>
>>>> Boris, Michael,
>>>>
>>>> My understanding is that TC and ImplRep will be published as W3C Notes. This means they get both timestamped URLs and permalinks in the http://www.w3.org/TR/ space.
>>>>
>>>> I understand that these are the latest candidate documents:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/
>>>>
>>>> I reviewed both from a W3C style point of view and they still need quite a few changes! A list is below.
>>>>
>>>> (I can help make those changes tomorrow morning if necessary.)
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. Date of publication needs to be changed to 14 August 2012
>>>>
>>>> 2. “This version” needs to point to correct timestamped URL *in TR space*
>>>>
>>>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-test-cases/
>>>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-implementations/
>>>>
>>>> 3. “Latest version” needs to point to untimestamped shortname *in TR space*
>>>>
>>>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-test-cases-20120814/
>>>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-implementations-20120814/
>>>>
>>>> 4. SotD needs to be for a NOTE, not for an ED. I'm not sure what exactly the SotD should say, but I guess you can use these as rough templates:
>>>>
>>>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-api/
>>>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/
>>>>
>>>> 5. References in the ImplRep need to use URLs in TR space with correct date, timestamp, and without “work in progress” markers.
>>>>
>>>> 6. Many URLs in the body of both documents need to be updated from ED or from old WD/CR to latest PR URLs (or alrernatively to untimestamped shortname URL in TR space).               This includes all the spec references in the TC, and all the TC links in the ImplRep.
>>>>
>>>> 7. TC Section 4 contains a messed-up link to "Section 10 of the R2RML specification"; I guess the intended target URL is http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/#note-natural-mapping-extensions
>>>>
>>>> 8. ImplRep Section 4 (References) contains a messed-up reference for [RDB2RDF TC], there is some stuff about RDFa in there!?
>>>>
>>>> 9. ImplRep calls it once [Direct Mapping] and then [DM]
>>>>
>>>> 10. ImplRep defines a ref for [RDB2RDF-WG] that is never used, delete!
>

Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 00:40:07 UTC