- From: Souripriya Das <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:32:23 -0400
- To: bvillazon@fi.upm.es
- CC: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4DF908C7.1060407@oracle.com>
Thanks Boris. Before I forget, another item is to add a "LogicalTable" block, probably just above the "SubjectMap" block, in "Figure 1a: An Overview of the R2RML Classes." -- Souri. Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote: > Thanks Souri. > Alex already created an action for this. > We will update the figures. > > Boris > > On 15/06/2011 16:54, Souripriya Das wrote: >> Noted that .png files for figures in R2RML spec need to be updated: >> >> * Saw that SubjectMapClass.png is same size as (and probably >> identical to) ObjectMapClass.png. In fact, SubjectMapClass.png >> file seems to contain picture for the ObjectMap class. >> * LogicalTable class needs to be added. >> * Labels in the figures need to be consistent with the new naming >> schema (SubjectMap instead of SubjectMapClass, etc.) >> >> Thanks, >> - Souri. >> >> Souripriya Das wrote: >>> I have updated the R2RML draft based on resolution for ISSUE-18 >>> (reuse of SQL query, or logical table, in multiple TriplesMap >>> elements). >>> >>> However, to avoid complexity involving class hierarchy, I have not >>> introduced any subclasses for the new rr:LogicalTable class. >>> If needed, we can discuss this tweak in the next meeting. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> - Souri. >>> >
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 19:33:19 UTC