public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from June 2011 by author

Alexandre Bertails

• Re: abstract syntax for R2RML mapping (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Functions to compute URIs (Wednesday, 8 June)

ashok malhotra

• Minutes from June 28 Telcon (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Agenda for June 28 Telcon (Today) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Monday, 13 June)
• Agenda for June 14 Telcon (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Functions to compute URIs (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: Functions to compute URIs (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: Issue 42 (Monday, 6 June)
• Issue 42 (Sunday, 5 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)

Boris Villazon-Terrazas

• Re: Propose to close ISSUE-34 by dropping rr:tableOwner (Thursday, 30 June)

Boris Villazón Terrazas

• RDB2RDF Test Case for ISSUE 42 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: v.164 has ISSUE-18 resolution related changes (Wednesday, 15 June)

Daniel Miranker

• Re: Appeal to "database theory" in Direct Mapping (Wednesday, 22 June)

David McNeil

• Re: Propose to close ISSUE-34 by dropping rr:tableOwner (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: ISSUE-46 (shorter property names): Remove the "use" prefix from property names [R2RML] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Housekeeping on open/raised issues, with PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Propose to postpone ISSUE-36 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Functions to compute URIs (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: Functions to compute URIs (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Functions to compute URIs (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)

Enrico Franconi

• Re: The mapping language MUST define the set of relational algebra to be supported (Tuesday, 21 June)
• The mapping language MUST define the set of relational algebra to be supported (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Fear for explicit NULL values (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Issue 42 (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: Issue 42 (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: Issue 42 (Sunday, 5 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Wednesday, 1 June)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: ISSUE-46 (shorter property names): Remove the "use" prefix from property names [R2RML] (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: Fwd: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (Thursday, 16 June)
• a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• abstract syntax for R2RML mapping (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Functions to compute URIs (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: Functions to compute URIs (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)

Hausenblas, Michael

• Re: My mistake in the ISSUE-42 resolution (was: Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping) (Saturday, 18 June)

Ivan Herman

• Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (Thursday, 16 June)
• Fwd: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: abstract syntax for R2RML mapping (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)

Juan Sequeda

• Re: Propose to close ISSUE-34 by dropping rr:tableOwner (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Fear for explicit NULL values (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Saturday, 4 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)

Marcelo Arenas

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: Agenda for June 28 Telcon (Today) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Read: The Robustness Principle Reconsidered (Friday, 24 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Minutes of 2011-06-21 telecon (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: The mapping language MUST define the set of relational algebra to be supported (Tuesday, 21 June)
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: R2RML, v 1.65 2011/06/15: implementation experience. (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Minutes of 2011-06-14 telecon (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: abstract syntax for R2RML mapping (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Today's meeting cancelled ... (Tuesday, 7 June)

Nuno Lopes

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 21 June)

Percy Enrique Rivera Salas

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 21 June)

RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-47 (invalid-iris): What happens when rr:column, rr:template etc produce invalid IRIs? [R2RML] (Tuesday, 21 June)
• ISSUE-46 (shorter property names): Remove the "use" prefix from property names [R2RML] (Tuesday, 21 June)
• ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML] (Monday, 20 June)

Richard Cyganiak

• Propose to close ISSUE-34 by dropping rr:tableOwner (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Closing ISSUE-2 (was: Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: Agenda for June 28 Telcon (Today) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: ISSUE-46 (shorter property names): Remove the "use" prefix from property names [R2RML] (Thursday, 23 June)
• Appeal to "database theory" in Direct Mapping (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Propose to postpone ISSUE-36 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Housekeeping on open/raised issues, with PROPOSAL (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: R2RML, v 1.65 2011/06/15: implementation experience. (Monday, 20 June)
• My mistake in the ISSUE-42 resolution (was: Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping) (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: Functions to compute URIs (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: Functions to compute URIs (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Friday, 3 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL (Wednesday, 1 June)

Seema Sundara

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 21 June)

Souripriya Das

• Re: ISSUE-46 (shorter property names): Remove the "use" prefix from property names [R2RML] (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: v.164 has ISSUE-18 resolution related changes (Wednesday, 15 June)
• Re: v.164 has ISSUE-18 resolution related changes (Wednesday, 15 June)
• v.164 has ISSUE-18 resolution related changes (Wednesday, 15 June)

Sören Auer

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC (Tuesday, 21 June)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2011 19:57:44 UTC