Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC

travel and deadline mode. most probably I won't be able to join.

Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com


On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Seema Sundara <seema.sundara@oracle.com>wrote:

> Regrets for today. Too many other deadlines.
>
> Regards,
> Seema.
>
>
> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Below the agenda for today's telecon: you'll see in the agenda that I'm
>> experimenting with an 'issue pipeline' (RAISED -> OPEN -> Issue(s) of the
>> day) - more details during the call.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>    Michael
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**---------------------------
>> AGENDA Teleconference
>> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-07-19
>> ------------------------------**----------------------------
>> *16:00-17:00 UTC*
>> Local time:
>> http://timeanddate.com/**worldclock/fixedtime.html?**
>> month=07&day=19&year=2011&**hour=16&min=00&sec=0<http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=07&day=19&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0>
>>
>> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
>> Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF")
>> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C
>> ------------------------------**---------------------------
>>
>>
>> Chair: Michael
>>
>>
>> 1. Admin
>>
>> PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meetinghttp://www.w3.org/2011/**
>> 07/12-rdb2rdf-minutes.html<http://www.w3.org/2011/07/12-rdb2rdf-minutes.html>
>>
>>
>> 2. Issue(s) of the day
>>
>>
>> - ISSUE-34
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/**rdb2rdf/track/issues/34<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/34>
>>
>> As per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/**
>> 2011Jul/0077.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0077.html>it seems that the majority agrees with:
>>
>> [[ PROPOSAL: To resolve ISSUE-34, drop rr:tableOwner, and instead state
>> that rr:tableName MAY be qualified to include a schema name and a catalog
>> name ]]
>> If you do have a counter-proposal make sure you have it prepared up-front.
>>
>>
>> 3. OPEN issues
>>
>>
>> - ISSUE 2: RDF Syntaxes
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/**
>> 2011Jun/0165.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0165.html>
>>
>> - ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType
>> choices
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/**
>> 2011Jun/0111.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0111.html>
>> Souri has action to suggest IRIs
>>
>> - ISSUE-47 (Invalid-iris):  What happens when rr:column, rr:template, etc
>> produce invalid IRIs?
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/**
>> 2011Jul/0002.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0002.html>
>>
>> - ISSUE-48 Mapping SQL Datatypes to RDF
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/**
>> 2011Jul/0010.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0010.html>
>>
>> - ISSUE 22:  SQL Identifiers
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/**
>> 2011Jul/0007.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0007.html>
>>
>> - ISSUE-29:  Implicit or explicit conversion to strings
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/**
>> 2011Jul/0006.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0006.html>
>>
>> - ISSUE-37: DB Connection details in R2RML
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/**rdb2rdf/track/issues/37<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/37>
>>
>>
>>
>> 4. RAISED issues
>>
>> - ISSUE-43 Re-using public entity identifiers
>> - ISSUE-45 IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices
>> - ISSUE-47 What happens when rr:column, rr:template etc produce invalid
>> IRIs?
>> - ISSUE-48 Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF
>> - ISSUE-49 SQL terminology in R2RML
>> - ISSUE-50 Validation criteria for mapping graphs
>> - ISSUE-51 Handling of ill-typed literals
>> - ISSUE-52 Extended example in the test cases document
>> - ISSUE-53 RDFS vocabulary reference for R2RML, and namespace document
>> - ISSUE-54 Simpler constant-valued term maps
>> - ISSUE-55 Nested predicate-object maps
>> - ISSUE-56 Default termType for template-valued term maps should be IRI
>>
>>
>>
>> 5. AOB
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>    Michael
>> --
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>> Ireland, Europe
>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 15:44:28 UTC