- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:55:27 -0400
- To: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Marcelo Arenas <marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
* ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> [2010-11-03 09:37-0700] > > On 11/2/2010 5:43 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > >I think we're making progress on that. Juan, Marcelo and I are working > >out our editorial predilections on a pair of documents with identical > >structure. On the 9th, the WG can look at the two and cherry pick the > >pieces they like. > > /I am concerned with the *pair of documents" bit. Could you guys create a single document? > I am not keen to make the WG pick between documents. Juan and Marcelo are are still working on a proposal, and it's http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/alt possible that at the end I will be convinced that these changes improve the readability or clarify important points. It's also possible that they will work through that they think needs to be expressed and see it present in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/ In either of these cases, yes, otherwise, we will have to get there via some consensus process, with folks making specific assertions like "alt/ ยง 2.1 doesn't handle bnodes" in order to discriminate which recipe is more accurate or more readable. > Ashok > / -- -ericP
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2010 16:56:03 UTC