W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org > January 2012

Re: R2RML - Last Call Comments

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:02:10 +0000
Message-Id: <2E18D272-0B31-44F9-8D8F-9547EFAB988F@deri.org>
To: public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
Hi David,

This is a formal WG response to your LC comments here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-comments/2011Oct/0022.html

As mentioned earlier, we raised a number of issues in response to your comments:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-comments/2011Nov/0013.html

These issues now all have been resolved as follows:

ISSUE-70: Behaviour of fully qualified column names in rr:sqlQuery
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/70
  Addressed as described here:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-comments/2011Nov/0022.html

ISSUE-71: Column name collisions between child and parent queries in RefObjectMaps
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/71
  Addressed as described here:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-comments/2011Nov/0023.html

ISSUE-73: Section 11 cleanup
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/73
  Addressed by an editorial pass over the section (r1.187)

ISSUE-74: Re-organize the table in Appendix B.2
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/74
  We acknowledged that this would be good, but resolved not to do any changes
  due to time constraints:
  http://www.w3.org/2011/11/29-RDB2RDF-minutes.html#item03

ISSUE-75: Reconsider rr:tableName syntactic sugar
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/75
  We resolved to drop the syntactic sugar:
  http://www.w3.org/2011/12/13-RDB2RDF-minutes.html#item04

All the best,
Richard
Received on Friday, 20 January 2012 13:02:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 January 2012 13:02:40 GMT