W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org > November 2011

Re: (Editorial) Last Call Comments on the Direct Mapping document

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:09:40 +0100
Cc: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>, public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E5AA03EA-5AE0-42F9-AEC1-329F15C7949F@w3.org>
To: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
Juan,

thanks for those changes that you have made... And I consider those issues as closed.

Thanks

Ivan

On Nov 15, 2011, at 07:00 , Juan Sequeda wrote:

> Hi Ivan,
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> 
> My comments inline. I have updated the Editor's draft accordingly [1]
> 
> Eric, Alexandre: there are two comments that I would like you guys to deal with. Thanks!
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/
> 
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> some buglets...
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> ------
> Right before 2.3, the bullet item with the note
> 
> the predicate URI is wrong (it is still the former version), it should say <People#ref-deptName.deptCity>
> 
> Done!
>  
> 
> ----
> In the additional/changed triples in section 2.3, we should also add
> 
> <People/ID-7> <People#ref-deptName.deptCity> <Department/name-accounting.city-Cambridge> .
> 
> (this is also a triple that would change if the primary key was different)
> 
> Done!
>  
> 
> ----
> Appendix A.4, using set-builder notation:
> 
> Rule [44] still includes an editorial comment
> 
> //@@ I can't explain why this was:....
> 
> Also: I must admit I did not have the time to check the whole thing in detail, but I do not see where the predicate URI-s using 'ref-XXXX-YYY' are created. Are you sure the 'ref-' prefix is indeed part of the definition? Should that be in [38]?
> 
> Eric, Alexandre: can you respond to this. 
> 
> ----
> Appendix A.4, using set notation
> 
> I have the impression that [36] is wrong in the sense that it was not adapted to the latest version of the URI construction (still using '=' sign...)
> 
> Also, the same question on the 'ref-XXX-YYY' as for the previous version. Note also that the English text misses the 'ref-' string, too. Here again, it should be [38], shouldn't it?
> 
> Eric, Alexandre: can you respond to this. 
>  
> 
> ----
> General comment on Appendix B
> 
> It would be useful to use a different style (eg, background colour) for the boxes defining the mappings and the ones denoting an example.
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion. I followed the way R2RML does this. Done!
>  
> 
> -----
> Comment on Appendix B.3.1.
> 
> I miss the reference to the reference property iri-s. It seems that the whole formalism uses the 'generateLiteralProperty' function only, but I would expect, in this case, a separate generateReferenceProperty function. This should be defined and referred to from here...
> 
> Thanks for catching this. Done! 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 08:07:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 November 2011 08:07:09 GMT