W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org > November 2011

Re: (Editorial) Last Call Comments on the Direct Mapping document

From: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:28 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMVTWDyuUMFBXGLdTKhCXvsXwDoM3ouJ__V_qg9SQfnimFHE+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>, public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
Hi Ivan,

Thanks for your comments.

My comments inline. I have updated the Editor's draft accordingly [1]

Eric, Alexandre: there are two comments that I would like you guys to deal
with. Thanks!

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> some buglets...
>
> Ivan
>
>
> ------
> Right before 2.3, the bullet item with the note
>
> the predicate URI is wrong (it is still the former version), it should say
> <People#ref-deptName.deptCity>
>

Done!


>
> ----
> In the additional/changed triples in section 2.3, we should also add
>
> <People/ID-7> <People#ref-deptName.deptCity>
> <Department/name-accounting.city-Cambridge> .
>
> (this is also a triple that would change if the primary key was different)
>

Done!


>
> ----
> Appendix A.4, using set-builder notation:
>
> Rule [44] still includes an editorial comment
>
> //@@ I can't explain why this was:....
>
> Also: I must admit I did not have the time to check the whole thing in
> detail, but I do not see where the predicate URI-s using 'ref-XXXX-YYY' are
> created. Are you sure the 'ref-' prefix is indeed part of the definition?
> Should that be in [38]?
>

Eric, Alexandre: can you respond to this.

>
> ----
> Appendix A.4, using set notation
>
> I have the impression that [36] is wrong in the sense that it was not
> adapted to the latest version of the URI construction (still using '='
> sign...)
>
> Also, the same question on the 'ref-XXX-YYY' as for the previous version.
> Note also that the English text misses the 'ref-' string, too. Here again,
> it should be [38], shouldn't it?
>

Eric, Alexandre: can you respond to this.


>
> ----
> General comment on Appendix B
>
> It would be useful to use a different style (eg, background colour) for
> the boxes defining the mappings and the ones denoting an example.
>

Thanks for the suggestion. I followed the way R2RML does this. Done!


>
> -----
> Comment on Appendix B.3.1.
>
> I miss the reference to the reference property iri-s. It seems that the
> whole formalism uses the 'generateLiteralProperty' function only, but I
> would expect, in this case, a separate generateReferenceProperty function.
> This should be defined and referred to from here...
>

Thanks for catching this. Done!

>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 06:01:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 November 2011 06:01:27 GMT