W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2009

[Bug 7529] New: [XQuery] General comparison argument conversion with xs:untypedAtomic and xs:NOTATION

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:34:08 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-7529-523@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7529

           Summary: [XQuery] General comparison argument conversion with
                    xs:untypedAtomic and xs:NOTATION
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: 2nd Edition Recommendation
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows NT
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XQuery
        AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com
        ReportedBy: oliver@cbcl.co.uk
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org


The errata XQ.E18 defines argument promotion for untyped atomic values in
general comparisons as follows:

If T is a numeric type or is derived from a numeric type, then V is cast to
xs:double.
If T is xs:dayTimeDuration or is derived from xs:dayTimeDuration, then V is
cast to xs:dayTimeDuration.
If T is xs:yearMonthDuration or is derived from xs:yearMonthDuration, then V is
cast to xs:yearMonthDuration.
In all other cases, V is cast to the primitive base type of T.


This definition is a bit wooly when it comes to comparing an xs:untypedAtomic
value with an xs:NOTATION value.

xs:NOTATION is clearly the primitive base type of xs:NOTATION.  Should this
raise a type error, or should a value be created with the abstract type
xs:NOTATION for purposes of the comparison?

Nowhere in the specification is it defined what it means to cast to an abstract
type, this issue is carefully avoided every time a cast is used otherwise.

This bug also affects XPath 2.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 September 2009 14:34:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:40 UTC