- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:12:16 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5795 --- Comment #13 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> 2008-06-26 13:12:15 --- Thanks Mike. fn:error really has caused us a lot of head scratching. On some days, I can convince myself that count(fn:error()) is 1. I don't like it. but I think it is correct. I may post a further question to clarify whether both: (1, fn:error())[1] and (fn:error(), 1)[2] can be conformantly executed without error. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 13:12:53 UTC