http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5795 --- Comment #11 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2008-06-26 13:01:10 --- >So do you think it conformant behaviour? I wouldn't dare to venture an opinion. With static typing, nothing (not even a failure to report a statically detectable error) would surprise me. But I think there comes a time when a test suite has to take a pragmatic view. The rules on errors and optimization license an implementation to throw an error for the query 2+2. I don't think that means the test suite should list this as an approved result. There comes a time when you have to report that you consider your result conformant even though it's not the expected result that was published. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Thursday, 26 June 2008 13:01:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 June 2008 13:01:48 GMT