W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Problems about module in XQuery spec

From: he harrison <harrison076@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:03:08 +0800
Message-ID: <f01ec07e0801150303l734ec3a9k194e6170e879d033@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
Cc: "Frans Englich" <englich@kde.org>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Right, I've already raise this quesion in the talk @ x-query.com and
got a lot of valuable help from experts like Micheal, Jonathan and so on.
The focus now has turned to whether the "redefine" violate the consistency
constraints. Seems I have to wait a while for official interpretation
from the W3C working group

2008/1/15, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>:
>
> >
> > This list tend to be a bit slow.
>
> This list is for formal comments on the XQuery and related specifications.
> The preferred way of raising such comments is in the Bugzilla system (see
> the introduction to the specs for details); but raising them here is an
> acceptable alternative. Either way, the comment will find its way onto an
> agenda of the working group concerned, and will eventually receive a
> formal
> response. This will often take some weeks. You may get personal responses
> before the Working Group considers the comment, but they will have no
> official standing.
>
> If you want a quick discussion and the personal views of knowledgeable
> people, then the talk @ x-query.com list is a better venue. If you want an
> official interpretation from the W3C working group, you need to ask here
> or
> on Bugzilla, but it will take longer.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 11:03:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:49 GMT