- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:19:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4023 ------- Comment #6 from mike@saxonica.com 2007-01-15 11:19 ------- Note also the text at the start of XML Schema 1.0 part 2 section 3.3: <quote> This section gives conceptual definitions for all ·built-in· ·derived· datatypes defined by this specification. The ... complete definitions of the ·built-in· ·derived· datatypes are provided in Appendix A Schema for Datatype Definitions (normative) (§A). </quote> This text makes it fairly clear that the definitive rules for derived types such as xs:unsignedInt are in the S4S rather than in the English prose, and it follows that "+123" is therefore a legal representation of xs:unsignedInt.
Received on Monday, 15 January 2007 11:19:58 UTC