http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3808 ------- Comment #3 from davidc@nag.co.uk 2007-01-11 22:34 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I buy your logic. The problem is: why is Constr-namespace-13 different from > Constr-namespace-22, whose result contains <child xmlns=""/> ? > > The test results Constr-inscope-10.xml and Constr-inscope-12.xml also contain > undeclare attributes. > that's different as xmlns="" is legal Namespace 1.0 syntax and is therefore required to be supported, it's just undeclaration of prefixes that was added in namespaces 1.1 DavidReceived on Thursday, 11 January 2007 22:34:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:18 GMT