W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2007

[Bug 4168] Atomicity is a problem for a non-transacted implementation

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:05:34 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1H4OA2-00076k-Ox@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4168





------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com  2007-01-09 21:05 -------
Perhaps the spec needs to say somehow that atomicity is guaranteed in the event
of application errors (errors that are defined in the language semantics) but
not in the event of a failure of the technical infrastructure on which the
processor is dependent?
Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 21:05:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:32 UTC