http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4272 ------- Comment #5 from tim@cbcl.co.uk 2007-02-27 17:05 ------- Personally, I think I'd just go with raising no errors at type check time, and raising err:FOTY0012 during evaluation. At least that way it is consistent with non-static typing implementations.Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 17:06:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:19 GMT