- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:54:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2817
chamberl@almaden.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Comment #1 from chamberl@almaden.ibm.com 2006-08-01 21:54 -------
Tan,
The Query working group considered your comment on Aug. 1, 2006. We believe
that the issue you raise has been addressed in the XQuery Update Facility
working draft published by W3C on July 11, 2006. A pending update list is still
defined as an unordered collection of update primitives. However, the
upd:applyUpdates routine, in Section 3.2.2, specifies the order in which these
update primitives are applied. This is a partial ordering (for example,
replaceNode and rename can be done in any order, but must be done before
insertBefore and insertAsFirst.) The partial ordering is defined by
upd:applyUpdates, not by treating the whole pending update list as an ordered
object.
Based on the above analysis, the Query Working Group has assigned a code of
"WONTFIX" to this Bugzilla item. If you are satisfied with this resolution,
please close the Bugzilla item.
Regards,
Don Chamberlin (for the Query working group)
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2006 21:55:00 UTC