W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2005

RE: [F&O] Contradiction between fn:boolean and definition of Effective Boolean Value

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:21:53 -0800
To: Colin Paul Adams <colin@colina.demon.co.uk>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050214072153494.00000002988@amalhotr-pc>

Thanks!  This has been fixed.

All the best, Ashok
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Colin 
> Paul Adams
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 7:08 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: [F&O] Contradiction between fn:boolean and 
> definition of Effective Boolean Value
> 
> 
> The definition of Effective Boolean Value says that a type 
> error (BTW, no error code is specified, as far as I can see) 
> should be raised in all other cases (a non-atomic sequence 
> longer than one item where the first item is not a node (?)).
> 
> But in F&O, fn:boolean says it returns true() in all other cases.
> 
> And the two definitions seem to me to say that they are 
> equivalent to each other.
> 
> I assume that it is the definition of fn:boolean that is wrong.
> --
> Colin Paul Adams
> Preston Lancashire
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 15:25:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:23 UTC