My understanding is that xdt:anyAtomicType type is defined as the union of all atomic types and that atomic types are only those such as xs:integer, xs:string, etc. It would therefore seem to be the case that xdt:anyAtomicType itself is not "atomic." This makes perfect sense to me, but it is correct? Or should xdt:anyAtomicType itslef also be considered atomic? - PaulReceived on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 23:31:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:09 GMT