I'm am confused as to what is supposed to happen if the argument to fn:doc() includes a fragment-id. On the one hand, the draft says the argument is an xs:anyURI, passed as an xs:string, so it is legitimate to include a fragment-id. On the other hand, the semantics is defined as a mapping of strings onto DOCUMENT nodes, and a fragment-id cannot point to a document node (though it might point to a document element). But the way URIs are mapped onto document nodes is not specified. Does this mean it is implementation-defined as to whether the fragment-id is used, or is it an error to include one? -- Colin Paul Adams Preston LancashireReceived on Monday, 1 November 2004 18:05:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:09 GMT