W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > March 2004

RE: [F&O] resolve-QName function, $element as empty sequence

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 00:32:54 -0800
Message-ID: <EDB607C8AC991F40BE646533A1A673E801718166@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@walmsley.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

Thanks!  We agreed to make the suggested changes at the joint WG meeting
yesterday

All the best, Ashok

-----Original Message-----
From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Priscilla
Walmsley
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 4:47 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: [F&O] resolve-QName function, $element as empty sequence


The description of the resolve-QName function says that the error
"invalid
lexical value" is raised if $element is the empty sequence.  This seems
to
be the wrong error message.  Perhaps "no namespace found for prefix"
would
be more appropriate?

I'm also not sure I understand why the function signature even allows
$element to be the empty sequence, if the processor automatically raises
an
error when it is the empty sequence.
 
Thanks,
Priscilla Walmsley
Received on Friday, 5 March 2004 03:33:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:13:56 UTC