Thanks! We agreed to make the suggested changes at the joint WG meeting yesterday All the best, Ashok -----Original Message----- From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Priscilla Walmsley Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 4:47 AM To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: [F&O] resolve-QName function, $element as empty sequence The description of the resolve-QName function says that the error "invalid lexical value" is raised if $element is the empty sequence. This seems to be the wrong error message. Perhaps "no namespace found for prefix" would be more appropriate? I'm also not sure I understand why the function signature even allows $element to be the empty sequence, if the processor automatically raises an error when it is the empty sequence. Thanks, Priscilla WalmsleyReceived on Friday, 5 March 2004 03:33:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:07 GMT