W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > March 2004

RE: [F+O] resolve-QName()

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 00:32:12 -0800
Message-ID: <EDB607C8AC991F40BE646533A1A673E801718165@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

Thanks!  We agreed to make the suggested changes at the joint WG meeting

All the best, Ashok

-----Original Message-----
From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kay
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 1:41 PM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: [F+O] resolve-QName()

This function raises an error if the second argument is an empty
sequence. So why does the signature allow an empty sequence?

Also, the error raised (invalid lexical value) is inappropriate.

Michael Kay
Received on Friday, 5 March 2004 03:32:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:18 UTC