Hello Liam, On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:27:08AM -0500, Liam Quin wrote: > The XML Query Working Group has considered the following message: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Oct/0096.html > > The following is a response from the Working Group. > > > I believe XQuery is missing an important feature; the ability to > > serialize a document in URI form, so that the resulting URI may be used > > as an argument to the GET method. > > The XML Query Working Group noted that there is already a standard method > for serializing strings (such as queries) as URIs: RFC 2396. We > also already provide the escape-uri function to reflect this. URI-escaping should work fine as an encoding, I expect, and I thank the WG for making that decision. But, what now remains absent from the XQuery specification is a normative dependency on it as the canonical encoding to be used for XQuery documents serialized into URI form. > We have closed this issue for now; please let us know if this > disposition is not satisfactory. Sorry, it's not. 8-( > > Thanks! Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.caReceived on Monday, 26 January 2004 16:47:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:04 GMT