At 04:47 PM 1/26/2004, Mark Baker wrote: >URI-escaping should work fine as an encoding, I expect, and I thank the >WG for making that decision. > >But, what now remains absent from the XQuery specification is a >normative dependency on it as the canonical encoding to be used for >XQuery documents serialized into URI form. > > > We have closed this issue for now; please let us know if this > > disposition is not satisfactory. > >Sorry, it's not. 8-( But if we said that URI-escaping is the normative way to escape an XQuery for a URI, you would be happy? I'm not promising anything, I'm gather information... JonathanReceived on Monday, 26 January 2004 17:03:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:04 GMT