W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2004

Last Call comments on XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language XSCH-QL-011

From: David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:27:58 -0500
Message-ID: <E552E4A688635B47AA9132C55C5AADB59DDD39@TPANTMAIL.verifone.com>
To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

Dear Colleagues,

This comment pertains to the 12 November 2003 internal WD of 
XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language [1].

Please accept our sincere apologies on being past-due with this

David Ezell (on behalf of the XML Schema WG)

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xquery-20031112/

XSCH-QL-011 Section 3.7.1 Direct Element Constructors

There is a seeming contradiction between definitions of "direct element 

    If the name, attributes, and content of the element are all constants,
    the element constructor is based on standard XML notation and is called
    a direct element constructor.

and later

    In a direct element constructor, curly braces { } delimit enclosed
    expressions, distinguishing them from literal text.

This contradiction could be remedied by modifying the first definition as
    One form of a direct element constructor is where the name, attributes, 
    and content are all constants in standard XML notation.     
Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 21:27:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:18 UTC