W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2004

[F+O] base-URI() undefined [was RE: [XQuery] BEA_028]

From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:00:05 -0000
To: "'Don Chamberlin'" <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>, "'Daniela Florescu'" <danielaf@bea.com>
Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004c01c3f6c6$c52464c0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
In this case it would be consistent to change the definition of the
zero-argument base-uri() function in F+O so that if no base URI is
defined in the static context, an empty sequence is returned.
 
Michael Kay
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Don Chamberlin
Sent: 19 February 2004 00:55
To: Daniela Florescu
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: Re: [XQuery] BEA_028




Dear Daniela, 
The following sentence has been added to XQuery Section 3.7.1: 
"If no Base URI is defined in the static context, the Base URIs of the
constructed and copied nodes are set to the empty sequence." 

Similiar sentences have been added to Sections 3.7.3.1 and 3.7.3.3. 

Please let us know whether you are satisfied with this resolution of
your issue. 
Regards,
--Don Chamberlin




Daniela Florescu <danielaf@bea.com> 
Sent by: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org 


02/15/2004 10:25 PM 


To
public-qt-comments@w3.org 

cc

Subject
[XQuery] BEA_028

	





XQuery: incomplete specification

Section 3.7.1 and 3.7.3 discuss the base-uri property of the new nodes
but does not say what should happen when
the static context has no base uri defined.
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 03:59:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:13:57 UTC