W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2004

[F+O] base-URI() undefined [was RE: [XQuery] BEA_028]

From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:00:05 -0000
To: "'Don Chamberlin'" <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>, "'Daniela Florescu'" <danielaf@bea.com>
Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004c01c3f6c6$c52464c0$6401a8c0@pcukmka>
In this case it would be consistent to change the definition of the
zero-argument base-uri() function in F+O so that if no base URI is
defined in the static context, an empty sequence is returned.
Michael Kay
 -----Original Message-----
From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Don Chamberlin
Sent: 19 February 2004 00:55
To: Daniela Florescu
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: Re: [XQuery] BEA_028

Dear Daniela, 
The following sentence has been added to XQuery Section 3.7.1: 
"If no Base URI is defined in the static context, the Base URIs of the
constructed and copied nodes are set to the empty sequence." 

Similiar sentences have been added to Sections and 

Please let us know whether you are satisfied with this resolution of
your issue. 
--Don Chamberlin

Daniela Florescu <danielaf@bea.com> 
Sent by: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org 

02/15/2004 10:25 PM 



[XQuery] BEA_028


XQuery: incomplete specification

Section 3.7.1 and 3.7.3 discuss the base-uri property of the new nodes
but does not say what should happen when
the static context has no base uri defined.
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 03:59:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:18 UTC