W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [XQuery] BEA_029

From: Don Chamberlin <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:01:51 -0800
To: Daniela Florescu <danielaf@bea.com>
Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org, public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFA832FB4E.A6B487FC-ON88256E3F.00058995-88256E3F.0005A8D3@us.ibm.com>
Dear Daniela,
On Feb. 18, 2004, the Query Working Group agreed that, in the grammar 
production named CompTextConstructor, the Expr between curly braces should 
not be optional.

Please let us know whether you are satisfied with this resolution of your 
--Don Chamberlin

Daniela Florescu <danielaf@bea.com> 
Sent by: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
02/15/2004 10:27 PM


[XQuery] BEA_029

XQuery:  syntax simplification request

Why is the Expr optional on the production [105] ?

If the expression is not present the entire text constructor
returns the empty sequence, so why support this syntax ?
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 20:01:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:18 UTC