W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2004

RE: [DM] BEA_005

From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:39:27 -0000
To: "'Daniela Florescu'" <danielaf@bea.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000301c3f479$288b8c00$6401a8c0@pcukmka> 

> 
> We should simplify the data model and request the name of a type (even
> anonymous) to be a legal Qname.
> 

Since there is no way for an application to determine the name of an
anonymous type, this would be (a) an unnecessary constraint on
implementations, and (b) an untestable assertion.

Of course, if your comment requesting that this property be exposed to
applications is accepted, then this objection disappears.

Michael Kay
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 05:38:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:05 GMT