RE: [XQuery] Re: [xml-dev] draft-rsalz-qname-urn

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Elliotte Harold
> Sent: 16 December 2004 15:51
> To: Michael Kay
> Cc: 'Rich Salz'; xml-dev@lists.xml.org; public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: [XQuery] Re: [xml-dev] draft-rsalz-qname-urn
> 
> 
> Michael Kay wrote:
> 
> > The XQuery specification, incidentally, defines a mapping 
> of error QNames to
> > error URIs. It's different from this one, of course.
> 
> The error URIs in the XQuery spec look like this:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2004/10/xqt-errors#XPST0017
> I agree with most of your concerns about the details of the proposed 
> qname URN scheme (IRIs vs. URIs, percent encoding, etc.) but at a 
> fundamental level I think the proposed scheme is better than 
> what XQuery is proposing. 

No "but" needed, we agree on that point too!

Michael Kay

I would suggest that XQuery adopt the new qname 
> URN scheme 
> rather than using http URIs to identify error codes. In fact, I'll cc 
> this to the XQuery working group to register it as a formal comment.
> 
> -- 
> Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
> XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
> http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/
> ref=nosim
> 
>