>Did you mean "unclear" ? Yes. Sorry for the unfortunate typo. /paulc ________________________________ From: Ashok Malhotra Sent: Tue 18/11/2003 7:12 PM To: Paul Cotton; David Carlisle; public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: RE: [F&O] charmod > We preferred to keep our reference to the Last Call document since it was clear to us if the August WD actually had any "official" status. Did you mean "unclear" ? All the best, Ashok -----Original Message----- From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cot???????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????? ??? ? ? ???? ???????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????? ?????????????????????? ????? ????????? ??????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????? ??????????????????????????? ??? ????????? ????????????????????????? ????????????????????????? ????????????????? ?????? ?????? ????????????????????? ????? ??? ?? ????? ?? ??? ??? ??????? ????? ?? ?????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????? ????????????????????????????? ?? ? ??? ??????? ????? ????????? ??????? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ???????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????? ???????????????????? ????? ? ? ??? ? ??????? ????????? ??????????????? ???? ????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????? ?????????????????????????????? ?? ???? ?? ???????? ??? ???????? ???? ?? ?????????? ????????????????? ???????????????????????? ?????? ??????????????????????????? ???????? ?????? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ?? ???????????????????DESIGNTIMESP=22360>modifications resulting from continuing collaboration with other working groups. A list of last call comments with their status can be found in the disposition of comments (public version, Members only version)." We preferred to keep our reference to the Last Call document since it was clear to us if the August WD actually had any "official" status. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Subject: [F&O] charmod > > > > There is a normative reference to an earlier charmod draft > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/ > however the current draft, is > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-charmod-20030822/ > ________________________________________________________________________ </BODYReceived on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 21:15:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:03 GMT