W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2003

RE: F&O insert-before function

From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 14:00:24 -0400
Message-ID: <E7AC4500EAB7A442ABA7521D1881439706324DB4@tor-msg-01.northamerica.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@walmsley.com>
Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

You are correct and we will change this description.  Thank you for this
correction.

/paulc
Chair, XML Query WG

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Priscilla Walmsley
> Sent: May 10, 2003 7:50 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: F&O insert-before function
> 
> 
> I like the change of name from insert to insert-before.  However, the
> rec currently says:
> 
> "The value returned by the function consists of all items of $target
> whose index is less than or equal to N, followed by all items of
> $inserts, followed by the remaining elements of $target, in that
> sequence."
> 
> Shouldn't that say just "less than N" rather than "less than or equal
to
> N"?  It seems the way it is worded, it should be named insert-after.
> 
> Also, it starts talking about "N" without introducing it in any way.
I
> think this could be addressed by saying "...inserted at the position
> N...." (i.e. adding the "N") in the first paragraph.
> 
> Thanks,
> Priscilla
> 
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 14:00:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:24 GMT