W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2003

RE: [F&O] 10.2.1 op:QName-equal() or fn:QName-equal() ?

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 13:02:09 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB0846B7E6@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org> 

It's op:QName-equal because it backs up the 'eq' and 'ne' operators on
QNames.

All the best, Ashok

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Svgdeveloper@aol.com
> Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2003 11:55 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> 
> 
> The title of the email expresses the question.
> 
> Andrew Watt
>
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2003 16:02:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:59 GMT