W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2003

[F&O] 14.1.2 - local-name() function??? or local-part() function?

From: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 15:03:30 EDT
Message-ID: <ba.3e432e56.2beea702@aol.com>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org

I would like to suggest that the function in 14.1.2 which is named 
local-name() be more correctly named as local-part().

Two possibilities occur to me. Either a straight renaming, correcting the 
potential for confusion arising from naming as local-name() in XPath 1.0 or 
allowing both local-name() (for XPath 1.0 compatibility) and local-part() in 
XPath 2.0. The idea of the latter suggestion would be to deprecate 
local-name() and signal local-part() as the function's name going forward.

Andrew Watt
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2003 15:03:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:12 UTC