The name of the fn:get-local-name-from-QName function echoes the possibility for confusion that the XPath 1.0 local-name() function introduced. There is no such thing as a "local name", as far as I am aware. It seems to me that it would be better to name the function in 10.2.2 get-local-part-from-QName() function, since that is what it does. I guess we may not get rid of the local-name() function as a historical relic but I think introducing more confusion in naming functions should be avoided. Andrew WattReceived on Saturday, 10 May 2003 14:59:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:59 GMT