W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2003

Re: May XPath section 3.2: / and //

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 09:42:37 +0100
Message-Id: <200305070842.JAA25160@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: Michael.Kay@softwareag.com
CC: Svgdeveloper@aol.com, public-qt-comments@w3.org


  In the XPath 2.0 data model, any node can be parentless, and any parentless
  node is considered to be the root of a tree, whether or not it is a document

"root of the tree" is OK but I think Andrew is correct that the
document ought not to say "root node of the tree" as "root node"
even though it doesn't have a meaning in Xpath2 means something
completely different in Xpath1 and confusion between root nodes and
"root elements" (document elements) is already a major source of
confusion and FAQ's: parentless elements are not exactly going to
simplify the situation and so trying to minimise overloading of the term
root and especially of "root node" would be good I think.


[this comment is essentially unrelated to the initial comment that
started this thread of course]

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 04:43:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:12 UTC