W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > March 2003

RE: Request for Primer

From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:25:24 -0500
Message-ID: <E7AC4500EAB7A442ABA7521D1881439704CCBE8D@tor-msg-01.northamerica.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>
Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

I am convinced that a large number of introductory articles, papers and
books are and will become available on XQuery.  For example please look
at the list of recent XQuery publications listed on the public home page
[1].

While this demonstrates there are others that agree with your desire for
introductory material it also indicates that they think it is possible
to do this sort of work outside of the WG (and outside of the W3C).

So for the foreseeable future I am going to encourage the WG to
concentrate on getting the XQuery specifications into Last Call and will
depend on resources outside of the W3C to provide the kind of primer
information you want.

/paulc
Chair, XML Query WG

[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Query#other 

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com [mailto:Svgdeveloper@aol.com]
> Sent: March 4, 2003 10:11 AM
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Request for Primer
> 
> 
> Paul Cotton replied in response to a request for a primer.
> > No one in either of the WGs has proposed the need for such a Primer.
> 
> Paul,
> 
> I guess that shows the value of the specifications being open to
public
> comment. If the WG members haven't already proposed a primer, it seems
to
> me
> to be a surprising omission.
> 
> >In fact we are trying to make the XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 language
> documents >themselves as "usable" and "approachable" as possible and
hope
> this makes having >a Primer unnecessary.
> 
> Given the passage of time since I first raised the issue I will simply
> comment that, at least as judged by the November 2002 WDs, there is in
my
> view a VERY long way to go to make the specification documents
> "approachable".
> 
> I reiterate my request for the WG(s) to consider producing one or more
> primer
> documents to significantly improve the level of approachability of
these
> specifications.
> 
> Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2003 13:37:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:24 GMT