W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Why no xf:type accessor?

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:50:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB03DA73C1@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>, <ed.knoll@cosd.fedex.com>
Cc: "John Mercado" <johnkmercado@yahoo.com>, "XQuery Comments" <public-qt-comments@w3.org>




Jonathan:
We need to solve this problem in any case.  The Schema WG
has started to discuss the NuNs question again and I'm hoping
there will be a proposal soon.

All the best, Ashok 
===========================================================
Ashok Malhotra              <mailto: ashokma@microsoft.com> 
Microsoft Corporation
212 Hessian Hills Road
Croton-On-Hudson, NY 10520 USA 
Redmond: 425-703-9462                New York: 914-271-6477 



-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com]

Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:09 AM
To: ed.knoll@cosd.fedex.com; Ashok Malhotra
Cc: John Mercado; XQuery Comments
Subject: Re: Why no xf:type accessor?

One problem with an xf:type accessor is that not every type has a unique

name - there are anonymous types that have no name, and local element
and 
attribute declarations whose names may be identical to other element and

attribute declarations.

One way of solving this would be to create a universal naming schema for

all types that can occur, but this was deemed too complex for XPath and 
XQuery 1.0.

Jonathan
Received on Monday, 30 September 2002 10:26:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:23 GMT