- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:21:34 -0500
- To: Thomas Gambet <tgambet@w3.org>
- Cc: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>, public-qa-dev@w3.org
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:04 +0200, Thomas Gambet wrote: [...] > Your response is indeed invalid. As explained on the second example [1], > a message is composed of 0+ context elements, a title element, and an > optional description element. Ah. Thanks. I was reading too fast. Even with all the examples. Sigh. > So your code should look like this: ... Right... http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/css-val/rev/576dde3fac24 It works now! http://qa-dev.w3.org/unicorn/check?ucn_uri=css-val.appspot.com/cssval% 3Furi%3Dhttp://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/general.css&ucn_task=test# Of course, my code is wrong when it says that .css file doesn't match the CSS core syntax, but that's another matter. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:20:44 UTC