- From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:51:50 +0300
- To: public-qa-dev@w3.org
- Cc: "Jean-Guilhem Rouel" <jean-gui@w3.org>, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, tgambet@w3.org, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
On Friday 11 June 2010, Jean-Guilhem Rouel wrote: > Le 10/06/2010 11:58, Dominique Hazael-Massieux a écrit : > > Le mercredi 09 juin 2010 à 23:24 +0300, Ville Skyttä a écrit : > >> I'd be interested in moving validator and link checker > >> > >> development to Mercurial (or Git, if available)... > > > > I'm copying Jean-Gui and Thomas on this, hoping they might have feedback > > on the feasibility / possible timeline of doing this — I know we've also > > started experimenting with setting up Trac to be coupled with some of > > these Mercurial repositories, and this may also be relevant to that > > discussion. > > Converting from CVS to Mercurial worked well for Unicorn and is quite > easy to do. Alexandre would have to create the Mercurial repository > first, but I think he needs a group of allowed "pushers". I am going to > request a new repository linked to a new group. > > About Trac, we are not yet ready to deploy it, but once it is, I'll > contact you, Ville. Ok, thanks. One related request in case someone who can do something about is listening: Could the subject of the commit messages include information about the project/repository things were committed in? Currently they look like "commit: $description" but it'd be easier to spot messages related to projects/repos one's interested in if they looked for example like "$project commit: $description", e.g. instead of "commit: restricted validation to public IP", say "unicorn commit: restricted validation to public IP"
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 16:52:21 UTC