W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qa-dev@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Decentralized versioning system at W3C

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:41:41 +0200
Message-Id: <267D8CE1-83D0-403A-B4E1-AFB1765B4692@iki.fi>
To: "public-qa-dev@w3.org list" <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
On Dec 9, 2009, at 10:38, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> The main two contenders seems to be Git and Mercurial; Git seems to a
> growing number of tools, and more advanced features; Mercurial seems to
> be easier to use, and possibly easier to set up on a larger number of
> platforms.
> 
> We’re interested to hear feedback on this question, in particular in the
> form of sharing experience of using them (inside or outside of the W3C
> community), and pros and cons of both systems.

I'd prefer to see the W3C choose Mercurial, particularly due to familiarity. Mozilla and html5lib already use Mercurial.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 18 December 2009 12:12:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:12:50 GMT