On May 2, 2006, at 1:36, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > How about other DTDs, e.g. those for HTML? They also get downloaded, although less so than XHTML ones. attached is a small file giving a good idea (I think) of the frequency at which the DTDs are requested. XHTML1 are the most popular by far, with HTML4 transitional and xhtml-mod DTD second and third. > I would suspect this is due > documents that have an incorrect XHTML FPI and so get recognized as > HTML > documents; since the XHTML DTDs are not in the SGML catalog, OpenSP > will > fetch the XHTML DTD specified in the SI over the network. If that is > the > problem, you would however be able to reproduce it. Hmm, I guess that does not explain everything, but that's a tempting explanation. I'll test it today. If that were the case, would merging sgml.dtd and xml.dtd, and have xml.soc and sgml.soc refer to the same fallback system catalog, help? I can't think of any issue it may cause, but I could be overlooking something. > Likewise, the custom DTD test would have to fetch the DTD; there might > be a problem in your analysis. Right, due to the idiosyncratic nature of logging on W3C mirror, I hadn't noticed that the request for that custom DTD was logged elsewhere. It does get consistently fetched. Thanks for your thoughts! -- olivier
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:43 GMT